Visible colors of Centaurs and KBOs

To illustrate and apply these new tools, we have compiled the visible colors and orbital parameters of about 370 objects available in the literature, assumed, by default, as unbiased samples, and carried-out the "traditional" analysis per dynamical family. Our results show in particular how: a) data error-bars impose a limit on the detectable correlations regardless of sample size and, therefore, once that limit is achieved it is important to diminish the error-bars but pointless to enlarge the sampling with the same or larger errors; b) almost all dynamical families still require larger samplings to "ensure" the detection of correlations stronger than +/-0.5, i.e. correlations that may "explain" ~25% or more of the color variability; c) the correlation strength between (V-R) vs. (R-I) is systematically lower than the one between (B-V) vs. (V-R) and not related with error-bar differences between these colors; d) it is statistically equivalent to use any of the different "flavors" of orbital excitation or collisional velocity parameters regarding the famous color-inclination correlation among Classical KBOs --- which no longer evidences to be a strong correlation --- whereas the inclination and Tisserand parameter relative to Neptune cannot be separated from one another; and e) Classical KBOs are the only dynamical family which evidences for neither (B-V) vs. (V-R) nor (V-R) vs. (R-I) correlations, being, therefore, the family with the most unpredictable visible surface reflectivities.