Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2024

Dutch speakers take referent predictability into account, irrespective of addressee presence

Listed in IISH Dataverse

Language comprehension involves continuously making predictions about what will be mentioned next.

Description

If speakers take these predictions into account, one would expect that they try to be extra clear (e.g., by saying “the girl with the big earrings”) when they are going to say something less predictable. Conversely, speakers do not need to be as clear when the listener already expects the thing that they are about to mention, and can therefore suffice with a pronoun such as “she”.

Previous research testing this hypothesis has found mixed results, with some studies finding that the referent’s predictability in discourse affects pronoun use and others finding that it does not. One explanation might be that speakers only take predictability into account when there is a co-present addressee who might engage in predicting the next referent. To test this possibility, I conducted a language production experiment in which participants produced spoken continuations of narrative fragments.

Read the rest (3 more)

The fragments were accompanied by pictures that made clear how the story continued. Half of the participants performed the task without anyone else being present, while the other half told the stories to another person, who had to pick out the correct picture. Referent predictability was varied by manipulating the coherence relation in the narrative context.

In addition, I calculated a surprisal score for each character in each narrative, as a more direct measure of its predictability. The results showed that as predictability increased, speakers were indeed more likely to use a pronoun than a definite NP to refer to the target character in their continuations. However, it did not matter whether the speaker was telling the stories to a co-present addressee or not.

The results are discussed in light of accounts that distinguish between taking the perspective of a specific and that of a hypothetical listener.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Stated by source
Arts and Humanities
From keywords
Humanities
Inferred from text
Linguistics 69%
Provenance · 1 source records, 9 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
IISH Dataversedoi:10.34894/OWTIEE11 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:4704enrichment · datasets iisg amsterdamtaxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (69%)
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:arts-and-humanitiessource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
created_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
descriptionsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
titlesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
version_labelsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0