Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2013

Written feedback as interaction : knowledge exchange or activity exchange?

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.5204/injfyhe.v4i1.133

This paper examines in-text, handwritten feedback comments on first year undergraduate writing in the discipline of Statistics.

Description

Using a small corpus of annotated assignments, I examine the grammar choices and content choices made by tutors as they comment on students’ work. To better understand the purposes of the comments, I draw on an interview with a tutor.

I make use of Halliday’s concepts of knowledge exchange and activity exchange to interpret the choices observed in the data, and the motivations discussed by the tutor, from the perspective of interaction. Finally, I discuss the implications of the analysis in terms of the formative potential of the feedback.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Provenance · 3 source records, 8 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/340469979 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/340469979 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/340469979 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title