Constarium
← Search

Table · dataset · 2026

Table 1_An integrated prognostic model incorporating clinical characteristics, multiparametric MRI radiomics, deep learning features, and intratumoral heterogeneity for glioma patients.docx

Listed in figshare

Introduction<p>Gliomas are the most common primary malignant tumors of the central nervous system, characterized by significant biological heterogeneity and poor prognosis.

Description

Multiparametric MRI-based image analysis has shown promise in prognostic assessment; however, effective integration of deep learning (DL), radiomics, and intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) quantification remains underexplored. This study aims to develop an integrated prognostic model incorporating clinical and multiparametric MRI-derived features and systematically evaluate the predictive performance of different feature combinations.</p>Methods<p>This retrospective, multicenter study included 183 patients from the UCSF-TCIA cohort as the training set and 109 patients from Chongqing General Hospital as an independent test set.

Based on preoperative multiparametric MRI—including T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T1-weighted contrast-enhanced imaging (T1CE), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)—radiomics, DL, and 2D/3D ITH features were extracted. Feature selection was performed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator–Cox (LASSO-Cox) regression, and both single and fusion models were constructed.

Read the rest (3 more)

Feature-level integration was achieved using a two-stage LASSO-Cox regression to leverage the complementary nature of information from different sources fully. Performance was quantified using the Harrell concordance index (C-index) and validated via Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p>Results<p>The fusion model integrating DL, radiomics, ITH, and clinical features (DenseNet121_DL+Rad+ITH) achieved C-indices of 0.801 (95% CI: 0.750–0.853) and 0.710 (95% CI: 0.638–0.783) on the training and test sets, respectively, outperforming all single models.

The corresponding stacking ensemble yielded a comparable test C-index of 0.701. Kaplan–Meier analysis confirmed significant risk stratification (P < 0.001). Time-dependent ROC analysis showed AUCs of 0.705, 0.721, 0.746, 0.800, and 0.873 at 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months.

Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predicted and observed survival probabilities. DCA indicated favorable clinical net benefit for medium- to long-term survival prediction (24–36 months).</p>Conclusions<p>An integrated prognostic model combining clinical characteristics with multiparametric MRI-derived features (DL, radiomics, and ITH) demonstrates strong prognostic potential for glioma patients. Fusion strategies generally outperform single-feature models; however, incremental gains from fusion are modest, and prospective validation in larger cohorts remains necessary.</p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Image 75% · Imaging 75% · Magnetic resonance imaging 65% · Tabular 65%
Provenance · 1 source records, 21 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
figshareoai:figshare.com:article/3395236310 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:461103mapping · figshare comvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['deep learning']
concepts[field].local:field:astronomymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:chemistrymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:ocean-atmosphericmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[modality].local:modality:imageenrichment · figshare comkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
concepts[modality].local:modality:imagingenrichment · figshare comkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
concepts[modality].local:modality:mrienrichment · figshare comkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (65%)
concepts[modality].local:modality:tabularenrichment · figshare comkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (65%)
descriptionsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
titlesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title