Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2024

To NER or not to NER? A case study of low-resource deontic modalities in EU legislation?

Listed in IISH Dataverse

Deontic modality (obligation, permission, prohibition) in legal documents can convey critical information, and identification of deontic modalities is often performed using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques as a `Deontic Modality Classification' (DMC) text classification task.

Description

As deontic modalities in legal text are not mutually exclusive, a key challenge with DMC is that it classifies the provided text into a single modality while in reality it might have multiple deontic modalities.

To address this, this study analyzes the feasibility of performing deontic modality identification as a Named Entity Recognition (NER) task over DMC task approaches in a low-resource data setting with EU legislation. Low-resource NLP approaches can offer solutions to tackle the problem of scarce data. In this paper, we use a rule-based approach with modal verbs and a Decision Tree classifier for DMC task.

Read the rest (1 more)

For NER, we utilize Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) in a low-resource setting and report on the reliability and precision for identification of deontic modality. Our experiments reveal that simpler models, like decision trees, out perform larger models in the low-resource setting of DMC obtaining macro-F1 score of 0.83. For the NER task, the CRF models show consistent performance for `obligation' labels with an F1-score of 0.51 but have wavering results for other classes with a max F1-score of 0.26 for `permission', and 0.08 for `prohibition'.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Text 75%
Provenance · 1 source records, 13 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
IISH Dataversedoi:10.34894/D9AKUS8 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:460208mapping · datasets iisg amsterdamvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Natural Language Processing']
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:computer-and-information-sciencesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:lawsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[modality].local:modality:textenrichment · datasets iisg amsterdamkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
created_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
descriptionsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
titlesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
version_labelsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0