Constarium
← Search

Table · dataset · 2026

Table 1_Framing BRICS enlargement in China's official discourse: passage-level qualitative content analysis with a pre-announcement benchmark.xlsx

Listed in figshare

<p>BRICS enlargement creates a visible setting in which official speakers may connect institutional membership to claims about the Global South and global governance.

Description

This study asks how official Chinese English-language passages that directly link enlargement, membership change, or partner-country arrangements frame representation, development, governance reform, strategic autonomy, and openness. A re-audit of 28 supplied official pages retained 19 non-duplicative post-announcement texts, segmented into substantive paragraphs or complete official answers.

A passage-level flag, enlargement_link, separates units stating a direct enlargement relationship from other passages in enlargement-focal documents, retained only for context and sensitivity analysis; broader BRICS texts provide a within-period comparison. Five non-exclusive sensitizing categories are coded under explicit semantic rules, and “reformist multilateral framing” is assessed as a five-gate second-order configuration rather than an inferred doctrine or strategy.

Read the rest (2 more)

Human-adjudicated coding of 121 eligible passages identifies 20 directly linking units across 12 documents. Open-partnership framing dominates (9/20, 45.0%) and occurs nowhere else (0/51 contextual; 0/51 broader); Global South representation follows (6/20, 30.0%); governance reform (3/20) and strategic autonomy (2/20) are less frequent; one passage specifies a development mechanism. The five-gate configuration never appears in directly linking passages; its two complete instances lack any membership link.

On a blinded 31-unit sample, raw intercoder agreement was 0.968–1.000 and Cohen's κ 0.890–1.000. A pre-announcement benchmark tests verified prior presence only. The findings support bounded recalibration—from prospective access to realized membership and partner-country institutionalization—rather than a new doctrine.</p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Political science 74% · Tabular 65%

Related

Provenance · 1 source records, 18 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
figshareoai:figshare.com:article/339493459 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:4408enrichment · figshare comtaxonomy-embedding@1.0.0title+keywords+description (74%)
concepts[field].local:field:astronomymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:chemistrymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:ocean-atmosphericmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[modality].local:modality:tabularenrichment · figshare comkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (65%)
descriptionsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
titlesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title