← Search

Data · dataset · 2019

Anonymous vs. Conference Peer Feedback on writing of English as an Additional Language learners

Listed in Teesside University Research Data Repository

Based on the interaction theory (Gass; Mackey, 2006; Long, 1996; Polio, 2012), this study hypothesised that the conference peer feedback group would outperform the anonymous peer feedback group on EAL writing.

Description

However, descriptive data for the variable effectiveness showed a slight trend favouring the anonymous group, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

From keywords
Earth & Environmental Science · English as a second language · Humanities
Provenance · 1 source records, 8 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
Teesside University Research Data Repositoryoai:data.mendeley.com/3zf5zjhgy3.47 h agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:470306mapping · researchdata tees ac ukvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['English as a Second Language']
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
descriptionsource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0
titlesource · researchdata tees ac ukconnector:researchdata_tees_ac_uk@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title