Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2025

Study 2: Students and Clinical Teachers’ Experiences About Productive Feedback Practices in the Clinical Workplace from a Sociocultural Perspective

Listed in IISH Dataverse and ODISSEI Portal — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.34894/b3ep4y

For feedback to be productive, it relies on the interactions of participants, design elements, and resources.

Description

Yet, complexities in clinical education pose challenges for feedback practices in students and teachers, and efforts to improve feedback often ignore the influence of culture and context. A recent sociocultural approach to feedback practices recognized three layers to understand the complexity of productive feedback: the encounter layer, the design layer, and the knowledge layer.

This study explores the sociocultural factors that influence productive feedback practices in clinical settings from the dyad clinical teacher-student perspective. A cross-sectional qualitative study in a physiotherapy clerkship involved semi-structured interviews with ten students and eight clinical educators. Convenience sampling was used, and participation was voluntary.

Read the rest (2 more)

Employing a sociocultural perspective through thematic analysis, the study examined feedback practices across the three layers of feedback. The analysis yielded different elements along the three layers that enable productive feedback practices in the clinical workplace: (1) Feedback encounter layer: dyad relationships, mutual trust, continuity of supervision, and dialogue.; (2) Feedback design layer: enabled learning opportunities and feedback scaffolding; (3) Knowledge domain layer in the clinical culture: Growing clinical experience and accountability.

In the context of undergraduate clinical education, productive feedback practices are shaped by social-cultural factors. Designing feedback practices should consciously integrate these components, such as cultivating relationships, fostering guidance, enhancing feedback agency, and enabling supervised autonomy to promote productive feedback. The attached files are the code list used for the thematic analysis and the full qualitative results report.

Links

Topics

Stated by source
Social Sciences · Social Sciences
Inferred from text
Specialist studies in education 72%
Provenance · 2 source records, 13 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
IISH Dataversedoi:10.34894/B3EP4Y11 d agoJSON v1
ODISSEI Portaldoi:10.34894/B3EP4Y7 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
concepts[field].anzsrc:group:3904enrichment · datasets iisg amsterdamtaxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (72%)
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:social-sciencessource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].dataverse_subject:social-sciencessource · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/subjects
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · portal odissei nlconnector:portal_odissei_nl@1.0.0/subjects
created_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
descriptionsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/description
publication_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
titlesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0/name
updated_datesource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0
version_labelsource · datasets iisg amsterdamconnector:datasets_iisg_amsterdam@1.0.0