Constarium
← Search

Table · dataset · 2026

Table 1_Deep cervical stromal invasion predicts poor prognosis in endometrioid endometrial cancer with cervical stromal involvement: a risk-stratification model for adjuvant therapy decision-making in endometrial carcinoma.docx

Listed in figshare

Background<p>Endometrioid endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion (CSI) has heterogeneous prognoses, but current models inadequately incorporate CSI depth.

Description

We evaluated whether deep CSI (≥50% stromal thickness) predicts poor prognosis and developed a risk-stratification model integrating molecular classification to guide adjuvant therapy.</p>Methods<p>We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 412 patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion treated between January 2021 and January 2023.

CSI depth was categorized as deep (≥50%) versus superficial (<50%) based on standardized pathological review. Molecular subtyping was performed per 2023 FIGO criteria. The primary endpoint was 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Read the rest (3 more)

Multivariable Cox regression identified independent prognostic factors. A weighted four-factor risk score was developed incorporating deep CSI (2 points), G3 histology (1 point), substantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, 1 point), and p53-aberrant subtype (1 point). Propensity score-matched analysis (1:1 matching) evaluated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) efficacy in deep CSI patients.</p>Results<p>Deep CSI was present in 71 patients (17.2%) and was associated with aggressive pathological features: higher grade (G3: 35.2% vs. 18.5%, P = 0.003), deeper myometrial invasion (≥50%: 67.6% vs. 34.9%, P < 0.001), and substantial LVSI (33.8% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.002).

Deep CSI independently predicted 3-year recurrence (adjusted HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.52–3.95, P < 0.001) after adjusting for molecular subtype and adjuvant therapy. The three-tier risk stratification identified distinct prognostic groups: low risk (0 points, n = 198, 48.1%): 3-year RFS 91.2%; intermediate risk (1–2 points, n = 163, 39.6%): 79.4%; high risk (3–5 points, n = 51, 12.4%): 52.8% (P < 0.001). In propensity score-matched analysis, EBRT significantly improved 3-year RFS in deep CSI patients (78.6% vs. 48.2%, P = 0.012; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20–0.88), with particular benefit for locoregional control (89.3% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.008).

The prognostic impact of deep CSI varied by molecular subtype: no significant effect in polymerase epsilon (POLE)-mutated, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) tumors, but identified high-risk subsets within no specific molecular profile (NSMP) tumors.</p>Conclusions<p>Deep CSI provides critical prognostic information in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Integration of CSI depth with molecular classification enables actionable risk stratification and identifies patients who benefit from EBRT.</p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Cancer 75% · Longitudinal study 65% · Tabular 65%
Provenance · 1 source records, 20 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
figshareoai:figshare.com:article/338285959 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[disease].local:disease:cancerenrichment · figshare comkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:321501mapping · figshare comvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Foetal Development and Medicine']
concepts[field].local:field:astronomymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:chemistrymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:ocean-atmosphericmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[method].local:method:longitudinal-studyenrichment · figshare comkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (65%)
concepts[modality].local:modality:tabularenrichment · figshare comkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (65%)
descriptionsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
titlesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title