Table · dataset · 2026
Table 1_Deep cervical stromal invasion predicts poor prognosis in endometrioid endometrial cancer with cervical stromal involvement: a risk-stratification model for adjuvant therapy decision-making in endometrial carcinoma.docx
Listed in figshare
Background<p>Endometrioid endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion (CSI) has heterogeneous prognoses, but current models inadequately incorporate CSI depth.
Description
We evaluated whether deep CSI (≥50% stromal thickness) predicts poor prognosis and developed a risk-stratification model integrating molecular classification to guide adjuvant therapy.</p>Methods<p>We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 412 patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion treated between January 2021 and January 2023.
CSI depth was categorized as deep (≥50%) versus superficial (<50%) based on standardized pathological review. Molecular subtyping was performed per 2023 FIGO criteria. The primary endpoint was 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS).
Read the rest (3 more)
Multivariable Cox regression identified independent prognostic factors. A weighted four-factor risk score was developed incorporating deep CSI (2 points), G3 histology (1 point), substantial lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI, 1 point), and p53-aberrant subtype (1 point). Propensity score-matched analysis (1:1 matching) evaluated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) efficacy in deep CSI patients.</p>Results<p>Deep CSI was present in 71 patients (17.2%) and was associated with aggressive pathological features: higher grade (G3: 35.2% vs. 18.5%, P = 0.003), deeper myometrial invasion (≥50%: 67.6% vs. 34.9%, P < 0.001), and substantial LVSI (33.8% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.002).
Deep CSI independently predicted 3-year recurrence (adjusted HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.52–3.95, P < 0.001) after adjusting for molecular subtype and adjuvant therapy. The three-tier risk stratification identified distinct prognostic groups: low risk (0 points, n = 198, 48.1%): 3-year RFS 91.2%; intermediate risk (1–2 points, n = 163, 39.6%): 79.4%; high risk (3–5 points, n = 51, 12.4%): 52.8% (P < 0.001). In propensity score-matched analysis, EBRT significantly improved 3-year RFS in deep CSI patients (78.6% vs. 48.2%, P = 0.012; HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20–0.88), with particular benefit for locoregional control (89.3% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.008).
The prognostic impact of deep CSI varied by molecular subtype: no significant effect in polymerase epsilon (POLE)-mutated, mismatch repair deficient (MMRd) tumors, but identified high-risk subsets within no specific molecular profile (NSMP) tumors.</p>Conclusions<p>Deep CSI provides critical prognostic information in endometrioid endometrial cancer. Integration of CSI depth with molecular classification enables actionable risk stratification and identifies patients who benefit from EBRT.</p>
Links
Where it is published
- DOI doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1851729.s001 ↗
DOI / persistent id · from figshare com
Catalogue records · 1
- OAI-PMH record api.figshare.com/v2/oai?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=oai_dc&identifier=oai%3Af… ↗
metadata API · from figshare com
Topics
- From keywords
- Astronomy & Astrophysics · Chemistry · Computer Science & AI · Earth & Environmental Science · Economics & Finance · Engineering · Foetal development and medicine · Humanities · Life Sciences · Medicine & Health · Ocean & Atmospheric Science · Social Science
- Inferred from text
- Cancer 75% · Longitudinal study 65% · Tabular 65%
Provenance · 1 source records, 20 field assertions
| Source | Key | Last seen | Raw |
|---|---|---|---|
| figshare | oai:figshare.com:article/33828595 | 9 d ago | JSON v1 |
| Field | Assertion | Extractor | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| access_level | source · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[disease].local:disease:cancer | enrichment · figshare com | keyword-concept-rules@1.0.0 | title+description (75%) |
| concepts[field].anzsrc:field:321501 | mapping · figshare com | vocabulary-mapper@1.0.0 | keywords['Foetal Development and Medicine'] |
| concepts[field].local:field:astronomy | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:chemistry | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-ai | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmental | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:economics-finance | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:engineering | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:humanities | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:life-sciences | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:medicine-health | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:ocean-atmospheric | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[field].local:field:social-science | mapping · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| concepts[method].local:method:longitudinal-study | enrichment · figshare com | keyword-concept-rules@1.0.0 | title+description (65%) |
| concepts[modality].local:modality:tabular | enrichment · figshare com | keyword-concept-rules@1.0.0 | title+description (65%) |
| description | source · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/description |
| license | source · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/rights |
| publication_date | source · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | |
| title | source · figshare com | connector:figshare_com@1.0.0 | /metadata/dc/title |