Constarium
← Search

Table · dataset · 2026

Supplementary file 3_Factors influencing fertility preservation communication and decision support for cancer patients: a qualitative evidence synthesis of healthcare professionals’ perspectives.docx

Listed in figshare

Background<p>Cancer treatments threaten fertility in reproductive-age patients.

Description

Although fertility preservation (FP) is an effective option, its communication and decision support remain inconsistently implemented in clinical practice.</p>Objective<p>To identify factors influencing FP communication and decision support from the perspective of healthcare professionals (HCPs).</p>Methods<p>A qualitative evidence synthesis of qualitative and mixed-methods studies from six databases was conducted.

Influencing factors were mapped using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting standards, and the confidence in the evidence was graded using the Confidence in the Qualitative Evidence (ConQual) scale.</p>Results<p>Factors influencing FP communication and decision support were identified across three CFIR domains.

Read the rest (2 more)

Outer setting: local fertility attitudes, geographic barriers, and policy shaped access to and engagement in FP communication and decision support. Inner setting: poor structural characteristics, survival-focused culture, limited FP knowledge, weak relational connections, and suboptimal multi-level communication hindered effective implementation. Individual: family support facilitated engagement, whereas patients’ capacity and emotional state influenced their participation.

Four constructs landed at a moderate confidence level, and six constructs landed at a low confidence level.</p>Conclusions<p>Effective FP communication and decision support require multi-level, tailored strategies targeting domain-specific barriers and facilitators.</p>Systematic review registration<p>crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/, identifier CRD42024600847.</p>

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Cancer 75%
Provenance · 1 source records, 18 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
figshareoai:figshare.com:article/3374605610 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[disease].local:disease:cancerenrichment · figshare comkeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:310103mapping · figshare comvocabulary-mapper@1.0.0keywords['Cell Metabolism']
concepts[field].local:field:astronomymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:chemistrymapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:computer-science-aimapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:economics-financemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:engineeringmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:humanitiesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:life-sciencesmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:medicine-healthmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:ocean-atmosphericmapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:social-sciencemapping · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
descriptionsource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
licensesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/rights
publication_datesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0
titlesource · figshare comconnector:figshare_com@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title