Constarium
← Search

Data · dataset · 2026

Exploring the accessibility of educational psychology (EP) written feedback for parents/ carers

Listed in ZivaHub and Deakin Research Online and DMU Figshare — shown once because both records carry DOI 10.17034/32639868.v1

This study explores the accessibility of Educational Psychology (EP) written feedback for parents/ carers.

Description

The effect of presentation style on parental accuracy and perception was studied through a sequential mixed-methods design. How parents experience and make sense of EP written feedback was also explored.<br><br>229 participants completed an online multiple choice questionnaire testing accuracy, based on four versions of written feedback, with language and/ or visuals manipulated.

The simplification of language and/ or inclusion of visuals did not increase accuracy but were significant positive predictors for perceived understanding, usefulness, and enjoyment. Template coding was applied to 79 qualitative statements. Themes included: the positive influence of visuals and simplified language on the tone of text and, the effect of language familiarity on perceived confidence.

Read the rest (2 more)

Eight participants engaged in two focus groups. A Discursive Psychology analysis proposed a construction of internal conflict for parents. EP written feedback is perceived as both functional and challenging.

A social justice lens framed the conflicting feelings parents experience when making sense of EP feedback. Additional considerations include parents’ role in sharing information and how children access and make sense of EP written feedback.<br><br>Findings were synthesised into a multi-theoretical model of accessibility, empowering parents to achieve a critical literacy level (adapted from Nutbeam, 2000). Implications for practice suggest the importance of a within text, within person and within context perspective when planning the content of written feedback for children, young people and families.<br><br>Thesis is embargoed until 31 December 2026.

Links

Where it is published

Catalogue records · 1

Topics

Inferred from text
Educational psychology 80% · Text 75%
Provenance · 3 source records, 13 field assertions
SourceKeyLast seenRaw
ZivaHuboai:figshare.com:article/326398689 d agoJSON v1
Deakin Research Onlineoai:figshare.com:article/326398689 d agoJSON v1
DMU Figshareoai:figshare.com:article/326398689 d agoJSON v1
FieldAssertionExtractorEvidence
access_levelsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].anzsrc:field:520102enrichment · zivahub uct ac zataxonomy-embedding@1.1.0title+keywords+description (80%)
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:earth-environmentalmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioralmapping · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioralmapping · dro deakin edu auconnector:dro_deakin_edu_au@1.0.0
concepts[field].local:field:psychology-behavioralmapping · figshare dmu ac ukconnector:figshare_dmu_ac_uk@1.0.0
concepts[modality].local:modality:textenrichment · zivahub uct ac zakeyword-concept-rules@1.0.0title+description (75%)
descriptionsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/description
license_textsource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
publication_datesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0
titlesource · zivahub uct ac zaconnector:zivahub_uct_ac_za@1.0.0/metadata/dc/title